The personal Form of this new Therapist Questionnaire (PST-Q) was developed because of the Fernandez-Alvarez et al

The personal Form of this new Therapist Questionnaire (PST-Q) was developed because of the Fernandez-Alvarez et al

(2003), and you can was created to evaluate “the latest gang of features that each specialist is applicable in virtually any psychotherapeutic situation, thus creating an element of the options that come with the brand new therapeutic operate” (p. 117). The questionnaire assesses five different proportions: flexibility-firmness (Academic subscale), distance-closeness (Expressive subscale), lower involvement-higher engagement (Involvement subscale), broad focused-thin centered (Attentional subscale) and you can spontaneous-structured (Surgical subscale). This is exactly an effective 36-items self-report level completed of the practitioners that have responses ranked to the a great size between step one (complete dispute)to help you eight (full agreement). The latest level has shown an examination-retest reliability regarding .79, that have Chronbach’s reliability coefficients for each and every subscale, below; academic, .69; expressive, .75; engagement, .78; attentional, .80; operative, .78. Factor Research found an effective KMO = .756 (Find Desk step one for alphas in the modern data).

Doing work Alliance Catalog-Small Mode (WAI-S)

The working Alliance Directory (WAI), developed by Horvath Greenberg (1986), try an effective thirty six items questionnaire that can easily be applied to one another subscribers and you may therapists that is ranked into the a great seven-part Likert types of scale from1 (never)to help you 7 (always). Tracey and you may Kokotovic (1989) recommended a consumer and you may counselor Performing Alliance Directory-Short Form (WAI-S), which has five activities for each subscale (Task, Purpose, and you may Bond) and you will complete WAI-S score, demonstrating higher reliability having leader levels similar to, plus much better than the latest WAI on therapist subscales and total mediocre results (Task, leader = .83; Bond, alpha = .91; Purpose, alpha = .88; and you may Standard Alliance, leader = .95). Find Dining table step one for alphas in the present data.

Procedure Listing (TL)

The strategy Record scale try adapted out-of Hollis (1995), exactly who catalogued an extensive variety of counseling and you can therapy process representing a standard spectral range of philosophical bases. So you’re able to improve so it extensive checklist based on processes put especially by cognitive behavioral and you may constructivist treatment orientations, we employed counseling psychology graduate students to see the complete range of 108 cures process and you can speed the fresh new the amount that for each technique is employed by for every therapeutic approach (intellectual behavioral and you will constructivist), using an excellent 5-part Likert kind of measure from just one (Never ever or Almost never) to help you 5 (Always otherwise Typically).


Sixteen counseling psychology graduate students participated in these ratings (six men, 10 women), with the Mage = (SD = 2.67). Results of a paired differences analysis for all 108 items indicated that there were 77 techniques rated as being used with significantly differential frequency by cognitive behavioral and constructivist therapies. We then divided this distribution of 77 techniques into quartiles and retained the top and bottom quartiles. This resulted in 20 cognitive behavioral techniques (e.g.advice giving, rational restructuring) and 20 constructivist techniques (e.g. emotional processing, reflection) that were rated most significantly different (cognitive behavioral vs. constructivist). This final list of 40 items of therapy techniques (20 cognitive behavioral techniques; 20 constructivist techniques) was used in the current study.

These types of forty issues were indexed alphabetically and participants were questioned in order to rate the latest the quantity to which they use per strategy within practice of procedures with each other good 5-point size from (Never or Almost never)in order to 5 (Constantly or Almost always). The brand new reviews of one’s 20 rationalist products was summed and a beneficial imply are determined so you can mirror the average volume of utilizing rationalist interventions (you’ll range = 1-5), together with same process was used when it comes to brand new 20 constructivist treatments.

The fresh new intense studies was utilized to carry out an excellent confirmatory grounds research into the Procedure List size. The modern studies was checked getting multiple-variate normalcy therefore the assumptions was basically satisfied. All kurtosis quotes into the details fell ranging from 1 and –1 variables but constructivist activities several, 13, 16, and you will 20 and intellectual behavioral product step three, which had a great kurtosis viewpoints between dos and you will –2. Consequently, this type of five situations was in fact taken off the brand new measure in advance of running the fresh Dating nach der Scheidung in Ihren 30ern confirmatory basis investigation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *